Oghenefejiro Etemire

Question 01 · Solar power engineering

Can a house heat itself?

Mostly, yes, if you design it to. I designed this house for south-west London from the first sketch: bedrooms, living room, kitchen and bathroom on a dimensioned plan, a balcony with safety railings, and a pitched roof shaped for solar panels. Passive solar architecture does the quiet work; an active hybrid collector system does the rest. Over a simulated year it covers 64.6% of its heating with sunlight, peaking at 90% in summer.

RoleDesigner & analyst (solo)
ToolsAutoCAD 3D · Polysun · Global Solar Atlas
ContextMSc module AE7203, Kingston University
Year2024

Scroll ↓

Start with the sun, not the boiler.

Before any hardware, the house itself does the work. The design faces its main glazing toward the sun with a calculated roof overhang: shading the windows in summer, admitting low winter light. High thermal-mass floors store daytime heat; passive-standard U-values (walls at 0.123 W/m²K versus 0.54 for a conventional house) keep it in. I drew the 2D plans and the 3D model as one coordinated set, checking every view against the drawings so the built form and the paperwork always agree.

North-east 3D render of the passive house
North-east view of the AutoCAD 3D model
South-east 3D render of the passive house
South-east view: glazing sized for winter solar gain
Floor plan drawing
Floor plan: 149.8 m², two bedrooms
Front elevation drawing
Front elevation: 2100 × 900 mm glazing

Then let the roof earn its keep.

The active system: 7 flat-plate collectors and 10 PV modules feeding a 5 kW heat pump, a 500 L storage tank, and a 6 kWh battery. I modelled it end to end in Polysun against real Wimbledon irradiance data (1,035 kWh/kWp per year).

Polysun system schematic of the hybrid collector system
The hybrid collector system as built in Polysun
Sankey energy flow diagram
Where every kilowatt-hour goes: the Sankey energy flow
64.6%average annual solar fraction
90%solar fraction at summer peak
94.1%of generated PV power self-consumed
~5 yrssimulated payback period

Proven against alternatives, not just asserted.

I compared the chosen system in Polysun against the same house without battery storage and against a PVT-preheating variant, on energy deficit, self-consumption, and CO₂ emissions. Storage earned its place: without it, self-consumption collapses and grid dependence rises through the winter months.

System comparison charts
System comparison: the battery variant wins on self-consumption

The working file, not just the write-up.

Original files

The genuine working files. Open them in AutoCAD or Word.

Passive house, full 3D model.dwg · 5 MB Floor plan drawing.dwg · 0.8 MB Full report: Solar Low Carbon Efficient Building.docx · 3 MB

Next question

Can wind pay for an island? →